Information in English
by Sann Historia Free Speech Committee
Our Committee opposes the Swedish government’s Levande Historia World War 2 Holocaust project.
We do not want the government bowing to lobby-pressure groups by writing laws making debate about the so-called World War 2 ”Holocaust” a crime, similar to German, French, Austrian, and Swiss laws.
This would be the thin-edge of the wedge, for if laws make ”Holocaust” debate illegal, what will be the next subject our government selects?
The government should not brainwash school-children about ”Holocaust” stories from eye-witnesses which have been shown by independent scientists to have been impossible.
In World War 2 Germany interned individuals and groups who they proved had been working as spies for the Soviet government. In the same way Sweden and other countries around the world detained people they felt were threats to national security.
The government can tell our children verifiable facts, but when they talk about detention camp guards throwing live children into an open fire, we believe they legally need to supply supporting evidence.
Our well-researched evidence is supported by irrefutable scientific documents, whereas their evidence is based on unreliable stories from traumatized war-time witnesses.
We e-mailed Levande Historia with scientific evidence that contradicts many of their stories, however they have not responded.
The United States and most world countries support free speech that generates healthy debate. Our Committee works to ensure free speech also continues in Sweden!
If you find material on this Web site that is untrue, please tell us and we will change it. If you find material on this Web site that is racist or hateful, please tell us and we will remove it.
US Fair Use
Section 107. Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair Use
Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include -
- the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
- the nature of the copyrighted work;
- the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
- the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.
Comments?